<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Harms and Company Consulting &#187; Research Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://harmsandcompany.com/main/category/research-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main</link>
	<description>Western Canada grant writing consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:22:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Catch up mode</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2010/03/12/catch-up-mode/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2010/03/12/catch-up-mode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in November I mentioned that I hoped to get some sanity back into my life and schedule in December. Well, I had a brief break between Christmas and New Year and then things got busy again. I can&#8217;t believe that it is already March and I haven&#8217;t been blogging for over three months. 
Lots [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2010/03/12/catch-up-mode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DG2010 &#8211; Oct. 12 Post Recap</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/10/12/dg2010-oct-12-post-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/10/12/dg2010-oct-12-post-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grant Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSERC (grant applications)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next few weeks are going to be dicey, so I am not going to commit to posting regularly. Boy, this sounds just like the intro to last week&#8217;s recap . . . 
If you would like to subscribe to this blog feed, just click on the orange RSS logo on the upper right hand [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/10/12/dg2010-oct-12-post-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No really, tech transfer isn&#8217;t dead!</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/27/no-really-tech-transfer-isnt-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/27/no-really-tech-transfer-isnt-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercialization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent post, I offered a full text version of Marcel Mongeon’s opinion piece from Research Money on the current challenges facing technology transfer in Canada. Technology Transfer Tactics, a monthly newsletter/ezine for technology transfer professionals, posted a commentary on Marcel’s piece on their blog.  In my opinion, they completely sensationalized what Marcel [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/27/no-really-tech-transfer-isnt-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Discovery stats posted</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/23/2009-discovery-stats-posted/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/23/2009-discovery-stats-posted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 05:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSERC (grant applications)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSERC (news)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NSERC posted an analysis of the 2009 Discovery grant competition (including comparisons to the 2008 competition) on their Program News page.
This is the most detailed analysis I have ever seen from NSERC. The change in grant level scatter plots are particularly fascinating. 
FYI &#8211; I had a bit of trouble getting the file because the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/23/2009-discovery-stats-posted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Transfer is Dead!</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/20/tech-transfer-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/20/tech-transfer-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercialization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s issue of Research Money (Volume 23; Number &#56) has an op-ed piece written by Marcel Mongeon, a Canadian thought leader in technology transfer and commercialization issues. Marcel&#8217;s commentary is spot-on with my position on technology transfer and academic research. 
Recent discussions about the STIC report and Gordon&#8217;s paper on the economics of peer review [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/20/tech-transfer-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
