<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Harms and Company Consulting &#187; CIHR (news)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://harmsandcompany.com/main/category/research-funding-news/cihr-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main</link>
	<description>Western Canada grant writing consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:22:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CIHR asks for feedback on draft strategic plan</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/06/cihr-asks-for-feedback-on-draft-strategic-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/06/cihr-asks-for-feedback-on-draft-strategic-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 14:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIHR (news)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CIHR has posted their draft strategic plan online. Beaudet has requested feedback by June 12th via an online web survey. View the memo here.
I haven&#8217;t read it yet, but I plan to.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/06/cihr-asks-for-feedback-on-draft-strategic-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIHR to provide retroactive supplements</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/04/08/cihr-to-provide-retroactive-supplements/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/04/08/cihr-to-provide-retroactive-supplements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIHR (grant applications)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIHR (news)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian Institutes of Health Research&#8217;s President, Alain Beaudet, announced that CIHR will be providing a one-time supplement to all operating grants awarded in the Fall 2007 and Spring 2008 competitions. It appears that grant holders will receive (on average) a 3% retroactive increase in funding.
Interesting. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/04/08/cihr-to-provide-retroactive-supplements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIHR&#8217;s official position</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/03/10/cihrs-official-position/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/03/10/cihrs-official-position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIHR (news)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I figured that if I was going to post NSERC&#8217;s position, I should also provide CIHR&#8217;s. This was actually posted ages ago &#8211; a much more timely response from CIHR and Dr. Beaudet. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/03/10/cihrs-official-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here come the cuts</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/03/06/here-come-the-cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/03/06/here-come-the-cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIHR (news)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSERC (news)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m coming to this topic a little bit later than everyone else since I’ve been trying very hard to limit my posts about research politics, but I can’t hold it in any longer. When Budget 2009 came out, I wondered where the tri-councils were going to make the cuts to their budgets. Anecdotally, the originally [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/03/06/here-come-the-cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genome Canada omitted from budget &#8211; this has to be an error</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/01/29/genome-canada-omitted-from-budget-this-has-to-be-an-error/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/01/29/genome-canada-omitted-from-budget-this-has-to-be-an-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIHR (news)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSERC (news)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See the Globe and Mail article &#8220;Budget erases funding for key science agency&#8221; January 29, 2009
This can&#8217;t be real. Will this government really let Canada look like a fool in international research circles by eliminating Genome Canada? A huge leap backward and loss of an international leadership position for Canada in genomics. A sad day [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/01/29/genome-canada-omitted-from-budget-this-has-to-be-an-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

