<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Harms and Company Consulting &#187; Intellectual Property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://harmsandcompany.com/main/category/intellectual-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main</link>
	<description>Western Canada grant writing consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:22:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>No really, tech transfer isn&#8217;t dead!</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/27/no-really-tech-transfer-isnt-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/27/no-really-tech-transfer-isnt-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercialization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent post, I offered a full text version of Marcel Mongeon’s opinion piece from Research Money on the current challenges facing technology transfer in Canada. Technology Transfer Tactics, a monthly newsletter/ezine for technology transfer professionals, posted a commentary on Marcel’s piece on their blog.  In my opinion, they completely sensationalized what Marcel [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/27/no-really-tech-transfer-isnt-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Transfer is Dead!</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/20/tech-transfer-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/20/tech-transfer-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercialization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Funding News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s issue of Research Money (Volume 23; Number &#56) has an op-ed piece written by Marcel Mongeon, a Canadian thought leader in technology transfer and commercialization issues. Marcel&#8217;s commentary is spot-on with my position on technology transfer and academic research. 
Recent discussions about the STIC report and Gordon&#8217;s paper on the economics of peer review [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/05/20/tech-transfer-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World IP Day – April 26, 2009</title>
		<link>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/04/26/world-ip-day-%e2%80%93-april-26-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/04/26/world-ip-day-%e2%80%93-april-26-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Harms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harmsandcompany.com/main/?p=605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is World Intellectual Property Day – a day to “celebrate and promote innovation and economic growth”. This year the focus is Green Innovation: “the development and diffusion of technological means to tackle climate change . . . [the] key[s] to halting the depletion of the earth’s resources”. 
Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO)
World Intellectual Property [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://harmsandcompany.com/main/2009/04/26/world-ip-day-%e2%80%93-april-26-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
